AI Agent Use Cases

Added today

44All 189

Prompt to Prepare a Shopping Cart from a Recipe Photo

The author reports that Grok Bot receives a recipe photo, organizes the ingredients and quantities, and creates a shopping list by excluding ingredients already available at home.

Grok Bot
Life & Hobbies

1–20 of 189

Work & Research

Agent for Comparing Delivery Confirmations and ERP, Requesting Corrections or Verification

The author reports that Duvo compares delivery confirmations with SAP records, and if there are discrepancies, connects to correction or responsible person verification.

How it works

  1. The author links delivery information from the supplier portal, SAP order records, and applicable contract terms.
  2. The author queries the supplier portal and SAP, compares them with contract terms, and then decides the next action among automatic correction, requesting verification from the responsible person, or sending a follow-up email.

Results

The author explains that Duvo operates a workflow that compares delivery confirmations and ERP discrepancies and proceeds with follow-up actions.

Notes

This is a company case introducing operations like those of Rohlik. Internal code and performance figures were not independently reproduced.

Source

Duvo / Claude 고객 사례 Original post ↗

Example prompt · Claude

Goal: Handle follow-up tasks when delivery confirmations and ERP records differ.

Input/Environment: [Supplier portal], [ERP test account], [Contract terms], [Responsible person approval criteria].

Reference original: https://claude.com/customers/duvo

Based on the published workflow, prepare implementation or work procedures that can be followed in a test environment. Do not guess internal code or settings not disclosed in the original; if alternative connections are needed, indicate so.

Connections and materials to prepare: Link delivery information from the supplier portal, SAP order records, and applicable contract terms.

Agent actions to implement: Query the supplier portal and SAP, compare with contract terms, and decide the next action among automatic correction, requesting verification from the responsible person, or sending a follow-up email.

Scope: This is a company case introducing operations like those of Rohlik. Internal code and performance figures were not independently reproduced.

The output should include discrepancy details and a record of follow-up actions. Also organize the required setup steps and actual execution methods. After checking the results returned by the tool, select the next task, and separately note any inaccessible data or tasks not executed.

Verification: Include cases of quantity mismatch, contractually allowed tolerance, and those requiring responsible person verification, and check which action was chosen for each. Clearly distinguish the input used for verification, the actual output, and items not yet verified.