AI Agent Use Cases

Added today

44All 189

Prompt to Prepare a Shopping Cart from a Recipe Photo

The author reports that Grok Bot receives a recipe photo, organizes the ingredients and quantities, and creates a shopping list by excluding ingredients already available at home.

Grok Bot
Life & Hobbies

1–20 of 189

DevWalkthrough

Agent That Finds Team Coding Rules and Reviews PR Changes

This is an example where a PR review agent looks up the team's coding rules and compares them with the changed code to generate review comments.

How it works

  1. Connect the team's rules in Google Sheets with the PR changes to be reviewed.
  2. The review agent queries the Google Sheets tool where the team rules are stored and compares them with the changed code to generate review comments.

Results

In the public example, the intended output is a draft code review with comments based on the rules.

Notes

This is a read-only code review template. It is distinct from features that actually run tests or create modification PRs. The author reports that public settings and tool connections were checked, but the workflow was not executed directly.

Source

n8n 공개 워크플로 #3804 Original post ↗

Example prompt · n8n

Goal: Find the team's coding rules and review PR changes.

Inputs/Environment: [PR changes], [team rules table], [Sheets connection], [review output format].

Reference original: https://n8n.io/workflows/3804

Prepare the settings and connections so that a test environment can be created using the public configuration from the original. If there are any missing sub-workflows, APIs, or account permissions, mark them as incomplete until they are actually connected.

Connections and materials to prepare: Connect the team's rules in Google Sheets with the PR changes to be reviewed.

Agent actions to implement: The review agent queries the Google Sheets tool where the team rules are stored and compares them with the changed code to generate review comments.

Scope of actions: This is a read-only code review template. It is distinct from features that actually run tests or create modification PRs.

The output is a draft code review with comments based on the rules. Please also organize the necessary setup steps and actual execution method. After checking the results returned by the tool, select the next task, and separately note any materials that could not be accessed or tasks that could not be executed.

Verification: Check whether the cited rules actually exist in the table and whether comments are not incorrectly made on unchanged code. Show the inputs used for verification, the actual output, and clearly separate any items that have not yet been verified.